↓
 

ISSN: 2542-2006

Ecology and dynamics

Just another WordPress site

  • Main page
  • Contacts
  • Open Access
  • Archive
    • Opening Statement of the Editor-in-Chief
    • Articles
      • Articles. No.3, 2019
      • Articles. No.4, 2019
      • Articles. No.1, 2020
      • Articles. No.2, 2020
      • Articles. No.3, 2020
      • Articles. No.4, 2020
      • Articles. No.1, 2021
      • Articles. No.2, 2021
      • Articles. No.3, 2021
      • Articles. No.4, 2021
      • Articles. No.1, 2022
      • Articles. No.2, 2022
      • Articles. No.3, 2022
      • Articles. No.3, 2023
      • Articles. No.1, 2023
      • Articles. No.2, 2023
      • Articles. No.3, 2023
      • Articles. No.4, 2023
      • Articles. No.1, 2024
      • Articles. No.2, 2024
      • Articles. No.3, 2024
      • Articles. No.4, 2024
      • Articles. No.1, 2025
      • Articles. No.2, 2025
      • Articles. No.3, 2025
      • Articles. No.4, 2025
    • Issues
      • Issues for 2017
      • Issues for 2018
      • Issues for 2019
      • Issues for 2020
      • Issues for 2021
      • Issues for 2022
      • Issues for 2023
      • Issues for 2024
      • Issues for 2025
      • Issues for 2026

Articles. No.4, 2025

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VEGETATION STRUCTURE IN MOUNTAIN FOREST ECOSYSTEMS OF NORTHERN MONGOLIA (BASED ON THE MODEL POLYGONS)

Ecology and dynamics Опубликовано 22 декабря, 2025 автором admin1 апреля, 2026

Petukhov I.A., Andreev A.V., Bazha S.N., Bogdanov E.A., Danzhalova E.V., Drobyshev Yu.I., Rupyshev Yu.A., Khadbaatar S. Comparative Analysis of Vegetation Structure in Mountain Forest Ecosystems of Northern Mongolia (Based on the Model Polygons) // Ecosystems: ecology and dynamics. No 4. 2025. P. 5-62. | Abstract | PDF | Reference

 

A field camp of the Joint Russian-Mongolian integrated biological expedition in a cedar forest
Mongolian students at work
Integrated field study of ecosystems
Cowberry-ledum green-moss cedar forest

Rubus arcticus in bloom
Cowberry-blueberry green-moss cedar forest
Petrophytic mountain meadow steppe
Ice remaining in a mountain-valley spruce forest

Burnt-out area in taiga, overgrown with birches
Mountain steppe meadow
Sparse larch forest on a mountain ridge
Mountain meadow steppe on the southern slope

 

In this research we conducted large-scale mapping (1:10,000-1:50,000) and description of natural ecosystems at the junction of two belts, forest and forest-steppe mountain, in the Selenga River Basin, Northern Mongolia. Part of broader studies on the forest growth conditions of the Lake Baikal Basin, this research took place in 2019 and 2022 across 4 model polygons: Zelter in the eastern Dzhida Range, Chandmani-Under in the central Eastern Khuvsgul Region, Zunkhara in the foothills of Western Khentii Highlands, and Selbe in the southwestern Khentii Upland.

“Selbe” and “Chandmani-Under” encompass 3 forest vegetation altitudinal belts: mountain-taiga, sub-taiga, and forest-steppe. The low-mountain “Zelter” and “Zunkhara” lack the mountain-taiga belt. Distinctively, unlike most mountain forest areas in Mongolia where only 1-2 coniferous species typically form the primary forest stands, the indigenous forest types in the upper Selbe River Basin are comprised of 4 coniferous species: Pinus sibirica, Larix sibirica, Pinus sylvestris and Picea obovata. In “Chandmani-Under” and “Zelter”, Larix sibirica is the dominant coniferous species, while in “Zunkhara” it is Pinus sylvestris and Larix sibirica.

The large-scale mapping data from the model polygons clearly demonstrated a regular altitudinal succession of altitudinal belts, transitioning from mountain-taiga forests at higher elevations of middle-mountain slopes, through sub-taiga, to forest-steppe communities bordering the steppe belt. As aridity increases from north to south, the lower boundaries of these altitudinal belts, including forest vegetation zones, shift upwards. For instance, taiga forests on north-facing slopes of “Selbe” are located above 1600 m a.s.l. (and above 1650 m on the south-facing slopes), whereas in “Chandmani-Under”, situated over 200 km further north, such forests descend steep north-facing slopes to below 1250 m.

The forest-covered area of the model polygons exceeds 70%. However, there is a significant proportion of secondary pyrogenic small-leaved forests, primarily dominated by Betula pendula subsp. mandshurica and Populus tremula. These secondary birch stands and early-stage post-fire successional forests account for 20-24% of the total forest area in “Selbe” and “Chandmani-Under”, over 50% in “Zelter”, and as high as 98% in “Zunkhara”, where indigenous mountain pine-larch and larch-pine sub-taiga forests are entirely absent.

Analysis of the maps depicting forest ecosystems with destroyed indigenous stands at various stages of recovery, alongside their legends characterizing topo-ecological development conditions, enables an assessment of forest degradation scales. This provides a basis for determining natural and technical restoration possibilities, methods, and volumes, and for selecting the most suitable forest cultures for restoration based on the dominant species in the original stands.

Funding. This work was carried out within the framework of the scientific program of the Joint Russian-Mongolian Integrated Biological Expedition of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Mongolian Academy of Sciences, and the state task of the Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences, topic No. FFER-2024-0025 “Biogeocenology and Ecosystem Evolution”.

Keywords: mountain forest ecosystems, topo-ecological conditions, altitudinal belts, forest-forming species, secondary stands, large-scale mapping.

DOI: 10.24412/2542-2006-2025-4-5-62

EDN: ADAUJU

Метки: altitudinal belts, forest-forming species, large-scale mapping, mountain forest ecosystems, secondary stands, topo-ecological conditions

GEOECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM COMPONENTS OF THE KHODTSA RIVER IN THE MOSCOW REGION UNDER ANTHROPOGENIC LOAD

Ecology and dynamics Опубликовано 22 декабря, 2025 автором admin1 апреля, 2026

Zamana S.P., Zubkova V.M., Makakhanyuk Zh.S. Geoecological Assessment of Aquatic Ecosystem Components of the Khodtsa River in the Moscow Region under Anthropogenic Load // Ecosystems: ecology and dynamics. No 4. 2025. P. 63-104. | Abstract | PDF | Reference

 

Overgrowing mouth of the Khodtsa River, summer 2020
Overgrowing mouth of the Khodtsa River, summer 2020
Preparation of water sedge for analysis

Water sedge sampling locations
Sampling of duckweed in the middle reaches of the river, 2019
Species composition of the caught fish – common roach

Presently, small rivers are under a extreme anthropogenic load, especially in regions with many industrial enterprises and high population density. Therefore, their abiotic and biotic components undergo negative changes, which makes a geo-ecological assessment of the aquatic ecosystem of one of them, such as the Khodtsa River in the Moscow Region (its source is at Elektrostal, and its mouth is at Pavlovsky Posad), quite relevant. We addressed the following objectives: determining pollutants in water, snow, coastal soil, bottom sediments, higher aquatic vegetation, and fish, as well as assessing bioindicators, the bioproductivity of higher aquatic vegetation, and environmental risk zones in different sections of the river.

We based our research on the data from field studies conducted in 2017-2023 at various sections of the Khodtsa River, and from laboratory studies. The general methodology included sampling water, snow, coastal soil, bottom sediments, and plants at 3 locations: source of the river, intermediate point, and mouth of the river. Standard methods from the Register of Quantitative Chemical Analysis were used for sample analysis. Currently, quantitative assessment of the risk of ecosystem deterioration is primarily based on the level of pollutant concentration exceeding the established standard in a specific component. However, when addressing environmental issues related to chemical pollution, it is important to consider the response of living organisms to pollution using bioindication and biotesting. Since abiotic components such as water, bottom sediments, and coastal soil in an aquatic ecosystem determine the most important processes that influence the functioning of biotic components (i.e., all living organisms), we used an ecosystem approach based on a comprehensive quantitative study of the migration of priority toxic elements in all links of the biogeochemical food chain of the Khodtsa River aquatic ecosystem.

Our studies of the river’s aquatic ecosystem revealed patterns of heavy metal migration in the “water – bottom sediment – coastal soil – plants – fish” system. Iron, cadmium, lead, ammonium nitrogen, and petroleum products were the predominant pollutants at various sampling sites along the river. Compared to the coastal soil, the bottom sediments were significantly more contaminated with heavy metals at the source and intermediate points. Spatial variability of heavy metal content in sedge (Carex aquatilis) was revealed, depending on their content in water and bottom sediments. Moreover, an acropetal pattern of heavy metal distribution in plants was observed: roots accumulated 7-24 times more Cd, 2-4 times more Pb, and 112-251 times more Fe than shoots. Therefore, to determine the pollution of the aquatic ecosystem with heavy metals, we recommend using sedge (especially its roots) as a bioindicator, which can also be used for phytoremediation of small rivers. The biological productivity of higher aquatic vegetation increased from the source to the mouth of the Khodtsa River.

A complex pattern of heavy metal accumulation in the muscle tissue of the studied fish species such as Amur sleeper and common roach was revealed. During a comprehensive assessment of the pollution of abiotic and biotic components, zonation of the river was carried out. The Khodtsa River is characterized by predominant chemical pollutants (heavy metals, petroleum products, ammonia nitrogen). Zones of increased environmental risk were identified at the source and intermediate point, indicating a significant contribution to pollution from municipal and industrial discharges from Elektrostal. However, later in 2023 monitoring of the coastal soil using the lettuce as a test object revealed that the heavy metal content at the intermediate point was higher than at the river’s source, which is explained by a significantly reduced pollutant input from Elektrostal enterprises. Therefore, for the most rapid and cost-effective assessment of river pollution by heavy metals, phytotoxicity testing of coastal soil using the lettuce as a test object should be used for monitoring.

Keywords: ecosystem approach, water, bottom sediments, coastal soil, water sedge, fish, heavy metals, bioindicators, phytotoxicity, river zonation.

DOI: 10.24412/2542-2006-2025-4-63-104

EDN: CYWCLE

Метки: bioindicators, bottom sediments, coastal soil, ecosystem approach, fish, heavy metals, phytotoxicity, river zonation, water, water sedge

TRANSFORMATION OF PHYTOCENOSES WITH HERACLEUM SOSNOWSKYI (APIACEAE) IN THE «BITZEVSKY FOREST» NATURAL PARK (MOSCOW)

Ecology and dynamics Опубликовано 22 декабря, 2025 автором admin1 апреля, 2026

Shvetsov A.N., Shaikina M.N., Kuklina A.G. Transformation of Phytocenoses with Heracleum Sosnowskyi (Apiaceae) in the “Bitzevsky Les” Natural Park (Moscow) // Ecosystems: ecology and dynamics. No 4. 2025. P. 105-124. | Abstract | PDF | Reference

 

M.N. Shaikina is doing a botanical survey in the “Bitzevsky Les” Nature Park (photo by A.N. Shvetsov)
A.N. Shvetsov and A.G. Kuklina are doing a botanical survey in the “Bitzevsky Les” Nature Park (photo by M.N. Shaikina)
Fallow lands overgrown with H. sosnowskyi in the “Bitzevsky Les” Nature Park (photo by M.N. Shaikina)
Hogweed-lupine fallow land in the “Bitzevsky Les” Nature Park (photo by M.N. Shaikina)

Controlled mowing of H. sosnowskyi in the “Bitzevsky Les” Nature Park by (photo by M.N. Shaikina)
Platanthera bifolia in the young birch forest margin in the “Bitzevsky Les” Nature Park (photo by M.N. Shaikina)
Gentiana cruciata in the “Bitzevsky Les” Nature Park (photo by A.N. Shvetsov)
Listera ovata in the “Bitzevsky Les” Nature Park (photo by A.N. Shvetsov)

The spread rate of the invasive species Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden. (Apiaceae) was analyzed in 2006-2020 using satellite monitoring, and the boundaries of its distribution were determined in the test area of the “Bitsevsky Les” Nature and History Park (Moscow, Russia). The current state of rare and protected plant species in the surveyed area was assessed. Geobotanical surveys were conducted using traditional methods, and the locations of protected and invasive species were recorded. According to the surveys of 2024-2025, in total 17 rare species from the “Red Data Book of Moscow” (2022) were identified: Anthemis tinctoria, Campanula patula, C. persicifolia, C. trachelium, C. latifolia, Corryganthe flos-cuculi, Gentiana cruciata, Dactylorhiza fuchsii, Listera ovata, Neottia nidus-avis, Platanthera bifolia, Primula veris, Lathyrus vernus, Polygonum bistorta, Polygonatum multiflorum, Steris viscaria, Iris pseudacorus. Additionally, 7 species in need of monitoring were found: Convallaria majalis, Leucanthemum vulgare, Maianthemum bifolium, Origanum vulgare, Orthilia secunda, Valeriana officinalis, Viola canina.

The termination of agricultural activities in the territory has triggered recovery successions that are followed by an increasing number of some rare plants. At the same time, Heracleum sosnowskyi continues to spread, changing the structure of the vegetation cover, slowing down the recovery processes, and worsening the species composition of the emerging phytocenoses.

Keywords: satellite monitoring, Heracleum sosnowskyi, plant communities, rare species, Moscow.

DOI: 10.24412/2542-2006-2025-4-105-124

EDN: KYXHWV

Метки: Heracleum sosnowskyi, Moscow, plant communities, rare species, satellite monitoring

AVIFAUNA BIODIVERSITY IN SOME RESERVOIRS OF KALMYKIA UNDER THE MODERN CLIMATE CHANGE AND INCREASING ANTHROPOGENIC LOAD

Ecology and dynamics Опубликовано 22 декабря, 2025 автором admin1 апреля, 2026

Shapovalova I.B. Avifauna Biodiversity in Some Reservoirs of Kalmykia under the Modern Climate Change and Increasing Anthropogenic Load // Ecosystems: ecology and dynamics. No 4. 2025. P. 125-145. | Abstract | PDF | Reference

 

 

A little bustard (Tetrax tetrax) in a meadow near the road, at the mouth of the Kirasta River (here and below all photos are taken by the author)
The spoonbills (Platalea leucorodia) on the Dunda River near the village of Kievka
A long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus) near the road, in a strip of man-made grove
A black-winged stilt (Himantopus himantopus) is nesting in the flooded lower floodplain of the Gashun River near the village of Oktyabrsky

The black-winged pratincoles (Glareola nordmanni) on a saline coastal strip in a drainage zone of Deed-Khulsun Lake
The pied avocets (Recurvirostra avosetta), feeding in a shallow water in the backwater zone of Deed-Khulsun Lake
The bachelor individuals of Dalmatian pelicans (Pelecanus crispus) in the backwater zone of Deed-Khulsun Lake
A pair of resting Eurasian whimbrels (Numenius phaeopus), the rare migratory species in the region

A flock of glossy ibises (Plegadis falcinellus) at the Chogray Reservoir dam
The little egrets (Egretta garzetta) are a rare breeding and migratory species at Podmanok-2 Lake
The little stints (Calidris minuta) are a rare migratory species at Podmanok-3 Lake of the Manych River basin
A citrine wagtail (Motacilla citreola) is a rare migratory and nesting species at Deed-Khulsun Lake

In this paper, we examine the state of avifauna of several wastewater and drainage water reservoirs, as well as man-made reservoirs of the Republic of Kalmykia, in 2025. We studied the composition and structure of the coastal bird communities of Lake Manych-Gudilo, Lake Ded-Khulsun, and the Chogray Reservoir, as well as several smaller reservoirs of local significance, since they are considered key bird areas of Russia. The water of some of these reservoirs, such as Manych-Gudilo and Ded-Khulsun, are specially protected natural areas of federal and regional significance, which facilitates their monitoring. We provided a current assessment of the diversity of the avifauna and bird populations of these reservoirs and their shores, including species composition, abundance, and abundance indicators. We also assessed the contribution of these reservoirs to the conservation and enrichment of regional biodiversity. We then made recommendations for managing their hydrological regime to maintain and preserve coastal ecosystems, including populations of rare and vulnerable bird species.

Acknowledgments. The author thanks the editor-in-chief and reviewers of “Arid Ecosystems” for their help with preparation of this article for publication; additionally, the author thanks Zh.V. Kuzmina and E.I. Tobolova.

Funding. This work was carried out for the research project of the Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences for 2025-2027, “Study of Surface and Groundwater Quality Formation Processes, Natural and Anthropogenic Mechanisms of Change in the Ecological Status of Water Bodies, Development of Methods and Technologies for Water Resources and Water Quality Management” (No. FMWZ-2025-0002), state registration No. 125030703344-8.

Keywords: steppe zone, desert zone, water reservoir, aridization, hydrological regime, climate, ecosystem, ornithocomplexes, bird population, rare bird species, key ornithological areas, specially protected natural areas, Red Data Book, risk of species extinction, factors affecting populations of near-water bird species, anthropogenic impact.

DOI: 10.24412/2542-2006-2025-4-125-145

EDN: MXHPLU

Метки: anthropogenic impact, aridization, bird population, climate, desert zone, ecosystem, factors affecting populations of near-water bird species, hydrological regime, key ornithological areas, ornithocomplexes, rare bird species, Red Data Book, risk of species extinction, specially protected natural areas, steppe zone, water reservoir

About the Journal

  • General Information
  • Open Access
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Ethics

Submission of the Articles

  • Guideline for writing an article
  • Guidelines for Submission
  • Guidelines for Design
  • Guidelines for Abstract

Reviewing

  • Guidelines for Reviews

Archive

  • Opening Statement of the Editor-in-Chief
  • Articles
    • Articles. No.3, 2019
    • Articles. No.4, 2019
    • Articles. No.1, 2020
    • Articles. No.2, 2020
    • Articles. No.3, 2020
    • Articles. No.4, 2020
    • Articles. No.1, 2021
    • Articles. No.2, 2021
    • Articles. No.3, 2021
    • Articles. No.1, 2023
    • Articles. No.2, 2023
    • Articles. No.3, 2023
    • Articles. No.4, 2023
    • Articles. No.1, 2024
    • Articles. No.2, 2024
    • Articles. No.3, 2024
    • Articles. No.4, 2024
    • Articles. No.1, 2025
    • Articles. No.2, 2025
    • Articles. No.3, 2025
    • Articles. No.4, 2025
  • Issues
    • Issues for 2017
    • Issues for 2018
    • Issues for 2019
    • Issues for 2020
    • Issues for 2021
    • Issues for 2022
    • Issues for 2023
    • Issues for 2024
    • Issues for 2025
    • Issues for 2026
  • Photos
  • Events
©2026 - Ecology and dynamics - Weaver Xtreme Theme
↑